Speech, Speech, Speech

I think for a speech to be successful in a high school graduate eyes is to make the audience laugh at some point during the speech. Also the speech can't be so serious to make the audience to be bored. You have to be serious and motivated to give a speech that will influence friends, classmates and family if possible. In a commencement speech there should be a limit to the time for the speech. Make it about yourself and classmates in a good way. Also, people giving the speeches need to talk slowly and loud enough so people can hear you. People need to honor the occasion and talk about what they have experienced and accomplished in four years. If I had any person speak at my graduation, I would want Channing Tatum to speak. He is hilarious and he seems like he would enjoy giving a speech to high school students. I would want Channing Tatum because he seems like the celebrity who would love to give a speech and he can be inspirational and because he is also very popular which can get St Francis High School more noticed. I would want him to talk about what he did after high school and his experiences that he had while in high school. It can be influential for people who aren't sure about what experiences they had.

What's in a Name? A team by any other name would still play the same...maybe?

 I don't think changing a name with help any situation or solve a problem. It can cause more conflict than it should with lawsuits and the Senators voting and giving their opinion about name changing. The Senators can do whatever they want with any type of situation, whether or not people aren't happy about a name changing especially if it is a popular sports team. I think it should be up to the team, owners and fans to decide whether or not the names should change. If it was offending people, like the Washington Redskins team, then it should be in control of whoever wants to deal with the negativity. I don't see the "redskin" name being offensive because no one really pays much attention to the name, just how good that team is. It is offensive to those who want it to offensive. The only people who benefit from the change would be the players on that team because they can't control what goes on with their team name. All the players just do what they're paid to do and it doesn't really affect them. The only thing the players will have to change is the colors they wear. I think the fans and the owners of the team will be hurt because the fans buy their team jerseys, t-shirts, hats, etc. and if the name gets changed, it will be a waste of money for them to even buy stuff. It won't even be worth anything because that team won't exist anymore. The owners of the team will be hurt by the change because the owner put so much money to make this team as good as possible and spent a lot of money on a stadium, players, colors, mascots, logos, etc. I think the Sterling case has impacted a lot of teams all over the world. Many of those teams owners don't want to have to go through anything that involves slang words that will affect people.

 

The original mascot was Miami Redskins, but people didn't like the fact that the name because it was offensive to Native Americans. The Native Americans were offended because it was being used as a term that hurt the feelings of the Native Americans and they wanted the name changed. It made the Native Americans feel like they didn't belong. In 1997, the name changed to Miami University Redhawks instead. It is not offensive.

Facebook Power or Facebook Powerless?

I think that Facebook does impact our mood because people can put whatever they want on their social media. So if people put how they feel on their Facebook it will effect our feelings and mood. I agree with the first article because Facebook is one of those websites where anyone can post anything about anyone at anytime. For example, there can be a group of friends that are really close, then all of a sudden one friend does something that irritates a friend. The rest of the group of friends can go on Facebook and be mean and talk about the friend that was annoying and irritating. If the friend who was being bullied saw those posts and statutes, that can make the friend feel negative about themselves and not wanna even do anything with her life. People have their own opinion about making accounts and even if it makes people happy, those people don't have to have an account because it can cause drama. People that are happy should stay happy. If people are miserable, many people would have an account to keep in touch with people, they haven't seen forever. I don't think Facebook has the power to control us, but it seems like people let Facebook control them. I do think society is addicted to social media because no one can ever get off it. They are on social media for about 15-20 hours a day. The more kids that are on social media the more addictive they will become to social media.

Are you looking up or looking down?

I think that Gary Turk is saying that too many people are looking and using their phones more than they are actually trying to have a conversation. It seems like the more people are on their phone than actually talking to people. Yes what Gary is saying is true because people are dataholics and can't get off their technology. I miss out on many things like meeting new people because I am on my phone and not being social in the real world. I can change this by doing more than being on my phone and social media. Our society is dearly changing negatively because no one can ever stay off their phones for 5 minutes. It is hard for most people to get off them. Also communication is changing negatively because there is no one socially talking face-to-face anymore like our society used to. There are not really any positive things about using technology. It seems like the more advanced the technology becomes in the future, will make our society look bad because no one will ever communicate socially without using their cell phone again. Eventually, we will be in a community where there is people just sitting on their phones doing nothing. I am guilty of not "looking up" because I don't always look up, but I don't always look down at the same time. I can get off my phone and look up when needed to. Most people can't even look up for a second. A lot of teenagers look down whenever and all the time every day.   

What Constitutes Art?

What's happening in Greece can be both art and graffiti. It looks like it's graffiti, but has the components of being art. The drawings are really good and they show very good art skills. Graffiti is most likely gang symbols or very harsh words in most cases. The Athens courts should determine whether or not these paintings are graffiti or art. No one wanted these paintings there, and people are showing off their art skills, but it's still illegal to do. The paintings should be painted over because they are illegally there when there not supposed to be. If one person is offended because there paintings are painted over, then it won't be a big. If a hundred people are offended, that is a slightly different issue because there will be many arguments. It's not up to the people who put the drawings there; it's the cities decision on what's best. I agree with iNO's statement because people do express themselves, but shouldn't do it if it's illegal. I like the painting that involves the car on the right side of the picture. It is very creative and colorful. The artist that drew this definitely showed their feelings. Words are definitely an issue because it can mean something in so many ways and people can be very offended.

Hoping for Asylum, Migrants Strain U.S. Border

I think the US should be responsible for these individuals who decide to sneak into the US without permission because they are in the US. If they weren't in the US it would be the countries problem wherever they are. Since these individuals are in Texas, then the US is the one responsible because that's what country they're in. The immigrants are no longer immigrants when it comes to how long they have been in the US. For example, if the immigrants are in the US for 7-8 years without permission, they should be allowed to be apart of the US. I wouldn't say the American people, but the government should be in charge of these individuals because it is their responsibilty to keep this country from anything bad happenening. If the government doesn't control immigrants like these, then the whole country can be at risk of something happening. If their are many immigrants for different countries, it would be very difficult for each country to keep up with all these immigrants. And besides the US doesn't take care of ourselves. The US spends money on other countries to provide them for better things. The US hardly takes care of their own country so I don't think it's every country for themselves in this type of situation. I don't think my hard work and taxes should be toward these people, especially if their sneaking in. I mean there are some children that are involved, but I don't want my money going to people who I don't think can even speak english. In my opinion, if you want to be apart of the US, then you should prove that your an American and can speak English before you do anything. I don't think it is fair that every person that works very hard to provide for their family be taken away from them so these immigrants can become apart of the US.

15.16.17...Does that make you an Adult?

I think it depends on the type of situation that the child is in because it depends on the physical and mental being of the child. Kids are adults legally when they're 18 but every child has a situation or mindset and some teens don't act like they're an adult when they're 18 or older. They don't act like their age most of the time anyways so it wouldn't even matter if they are called an adult or a teenager. I think the crime should usually fit the punishment and the amount of time you serve. For example, if a 16 year old was charged with first degree murder the sentence could be up to life in prison without parole or the death sentence. I think this is fair because if the child/teen wants to do adult things that involve breaking the law they should suffer the consequences like an adult. We have the legal age so everyone who is smart enough about their actions can go on with their life and those who don't want to follow the rules can suffer. It is all up to the teenager on what they want to do with their life. I don't think the teenagers are mature enough to handle any situation that involves prison or jail because they don't really care and everything is a joke to them. The parents are letting the kids do whatever they want without consequences and not parenting them correctly so that makes the kids think they can do whatever they want. This crisis cannot be easily resolved because no matter how hard the parents try to stop their kids from breaking the rules, it would be too late to change their actions because that's how they learned from parents and it can't be stopped.